Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District

Historical Significant Risk Facilities
Greka Oil & Gas, Inc.
Zaca Field

Location: Zaca Field – approximately 22 miles south and east of Santa Maria
Contact Person: Susan Whalen
(805) 310-9286
Facility Description: At the Zaca Field, thirty active wells produce oil, water, and gas. The oil, water, and gas are gathered, processed, stored, and metered. The oil is trucked out of the facility while gas is burned in a flare.

Photos | Toxic Emissions | Health Risk/Footprints
PollutantsPublic Notification | Risk Reduction | Links


Photos

Click on the thumbnails below to see full size photos of the facility.

vintagez1.jpg (62885 bytes)
oil production
 equipment
vintagez2.jpg (56597 bytes)

heater treater
vintagez3.jpg (96494 bytes)
 oil wells and pumps

vintagez4.jpg (98667 bytes)

oil storage tank


Toxic Emissions

The gathering, processing, storing, metering, transporting, and flaring the fluids at this facility creates toxic emissions from tanks, internal combustion engines, heater treaters, flares, well cellars, pumps, sumps and pits, chemical additives, solvent use, drilling mud, truck loading, and fugitive emitting components.

Most recent inventory of toxic air contaminants: 2003 


Health Risk Assessment Results

Below are the results of the health risk assessments (HRAs) performed on toxic emission inventories from 1991, 1994, 1998 and 2003.

The Health Risk Assessment Report for 2003 is available here.  The health risk assessment files for 2003 are available from the APCD upon request by e-mailing APCDPublicRecordsActRequest@sbcapcd.org.

Increased cancer risk is expressed as the number of individuals affected in a hypothetical population of one million. A significant risk is defined as 10 in one million or greater. 

Non-cancer acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) related illnesses are conveyed in terms of the Hazard Index (HI). The HI is a ratio of the predicted concentration of the facility’s reported emissions to a concentration considered acceptable to public health professionals. A significant risk is defined as an HI of 1 or greater. 

The risk footprints are maps of the area affected. The facility is required to notify the people living within the footprints. Footprints are only prepared for significant risks.  The footprints will change as the facility reduces its emissions and may not reflect the current risk footprint.

1991 1994 1998 2003*
Cancer risk:  29 in a million
footprint
37 in a million
footprint
22.58 in a million
footprint
7.26 in a million
not significant
Acute
non-cancer risk:
HI = 9.4
footprint
HI = 12.6
footprint
HI = 4.53
footprint
HI = 3.83
footprint
Chronic non-cancer risk: HI = 0.5
not significant
HI = 0.5
not significant
HI = 0.33
not significant
HI = 0.13
not significant
 
* Through the implementation of Greka's Risk Reduction Audit and Plan, the risk from the Zaca Field was reduced below the APCD's significance threshold.  Greka Zaca Field is no longer a significant risk facility.  See below for more information on risk reduction measures.


Pollutants

Risk "Driver" Pollutants

Acrolein was the primary contributor to this facility’s significant risk status for inventory year 2003.  Acrolein is a combustion product of internal combustion engines operating on field gas.

The links provided, if available, to the USEPA Unified Air Toxics Web Site Health Effects Notebook for Hazardous Air Pollutants.

Links to chemical information will open a new browser window the first time you click one. After that the information will appear in that same window, which may be hidden behind the window you are viewing.

Acute non-cancer:  acrolein (endpoint = respiratory system)
    - EPA hazard summary

 Other Toxic Pollutants Emitted by this Facility

The following pollutants are products of oil processing, storage, and transfer, well repair, and routine maintenance work, but were not the primary contributors to this facility's significant risk status for inventory year 2003.

acetaldehyde
    - EPA hazard summary

aluminum
  
arsenic
     - EPA hazard summary

ammonia
 
antimony
     - EPA hazard summary

barium

 benzene

     - EPA hazard summary

beryllium
    - EPA hazard summary

1,3-butadiene
    - EPA hazard summary

cadmium
     - EPA hazard summary

carbon tetrachloride
    - EPA hazard summary

chlorobenzene   
    - EPA hazard summary

chloroform   
    - EPA hazard summary

cobalt  
     - EPA hazard summary

copper

 p-dichlorobenzene
   - EPA hazard summary

1,1-dichloroethane
   - EPA hazard summary

1,2-dichloropropane
    - EPA hazard summary

1,3-dichloropropene
   - EPA hazard summary

ethylbenzene
 
ethylene dibromide 
   - EPA hazard summary

ethylene dichloride
    - EPA hazard summary

formaldehyde
     - EPA hazard summary

hexavalent chromium
     - EPA hazard summary

hexane
    - EPA hazard summary

hydrogen sulfide
 
manganese
    - EPA hazard summary

mercury
   - EPA hazard summary

methanol
   - EPA hazard summary

methylene chloride
    - EPA hazard summary

naphthalene
   - EPA hazard summary

nickel
    - EPA hazard summary

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
    - EPA hazard summary

propylene
 
selenium
   - EPA hazard summary

styrene
   - EPA hazard summary

toluene
   - EPA hazard summary

1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
   - EPA hazard summary

1,1,2-trichloroethane
   - EPA hazard summary

vanadium

vinyl chloride
    - EPA hazard summary

xylene
   - EPA hazard summary

zinc


Explanation of Risk


Public Notification

The primary goal of notification under the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program is to inform potentially exposed individuals of significant health risks associated with toxic air emissions routinely released from facilities in Santa Barbara County. The public notification letter for this facility was sent to the affected public on April 26, 1999.  The second public notification letter was sent on March 23, 2009.  The notification letter and attachments are available here


Risk Reduction

Because of the facility's significant risk status, Greka was required to conduct an airborne toxic risk reduction audit and develop a plan to implement risk reduction measures.

Greka Zaca Field's first Risk Reduction Audit and Plan (RRAP) was reviewed and deemed incomplete by the APCD.  A revised plan was submitted on January 26, 2001.  As part of the revised plan, the Zaca Field was required to submit an updated Air Toxics Emission Inventory Plan and Report for inventory year 2003.

The health risk assessment for inventory year 2003 showed that the Zaca Field creates a significant acute non-cancer risk from acrolein emitted from internal combustion engines.  Greka submitted a RRAP on April 9, 2008 to document the removal of the engines that created the significant risk.  The APCD conditionally approved the RRAP on February 11, 2009.  Greka submitted the revised RRAP on February 23, 2009.  The APCD approved the revised RRAP on March 6, 2009. 

The following measures were implemented in order to reduce the acute non-cancer risk to below the APCD's significance threshold:

1)    Removal of six internal combustion engines at various well site throughout the Zaca Field leases. 
2)    Additional restrictions were placed on the use, installation, and replacement of other internal combustion engines at the facility. 

These risk reduction measures are enforceable through the RRAP and the facility permits.

 


Links for Additional Information on Air Toxics

Return to Historical Significant Risk Facilities