June 14, 1996
Notice of Public Hearing
Proposed Revision to Rule 102 - Definitions
Proposed Revision to Rule 323 - Architectural Coatings
Thursday, July 18, 1996 - Approximately 2:00 pm
Board of Supervisors Hearing Room
511 East Lakeside Parkway, Santa Maria
The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Board will hold a
public hearing to accept comments and consider adopting proposed revisions to
Rule 102 - Definitions, and Rule 323 - Architectural Coatings. The revision to
Rule 102 will change the definition of “Reactive Organic Compound” (ROC) to
exempt acetone, ethane, parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF), volatile methyl
siloxanes (VMS), five halocarbons and four classes of perfluorocarbons. The
changes are being made for consistency with federal and state definitions. Rule
323 will be revised to rely on the new definition of ROC.
Who is affected:
APCD rules apply to sources of air pollution located in Santa Barbara County and
offshore within 28 miles. The rule revisions will affect the oil and gas
industry; manufacturers and users of paints, coatings, and solvents; and the
aerospace, electronic, wood furniture, automobile refinishing, paper coating,
and foam manufacturing industries.
About the proposed revisions:
The U.S. EPA and the California Air Resources Board (ARB) have changed their
definitions of Volatile Organic Compound to exclude the above compounds, based
on technical findings that show these compounds are negligibly photochemically
reactive. The proposed revisions provide consistency with EPA’s and ARB’s
definition.
Notice of Completion of Proposed Negative Declaration:
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the APCD has
released for review and comment an Initial Study/ Proposed Negative Declaration
for revisions to Rule 102 - Definitions and Rule 323 - Architectural Coatings.
The Initial Study examined the potential adverse impacts of the proposed rule
revisions. Potential impacts were limited to air quality, fire, and risk of
upset. Based on the Initial Study, the APCD has determined that there are no
significantly adverse impacts associated with the proposed rule revisions and
the project does not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report.
Therefore, the APCD has issued a Proposed Negative Declaration.
Copies of the proposed rule revisions and the Initial Study/Proposed Negative
Declaration may be reviewed at the following locations:
Santa Barbara County APCD 26 Castilian Drive, B-23 Goleta, CA
93117 | Santa Barbara County APCD 240 East Highway 246, Ste. 207
Buellton, CA 93427 |
County Clerk’s Office 401 East Cypress, Ste. 101 Lompoc, CA 93436 |
County Clerk/Recorder 511 East Lakeside Pkwy, Ste. 115 Santa Maria, CA
93455 |
For more information or to comment on the proposed rule revisions, please
contact Bette Easton, Rule Development Section, APCD, 26 Castilian Drive, B-23,
Goleta, CA 93117, (805) 961-8898. You may also comment at the July 18 hearing in
Santa Maria.
For more information or to comment on the Proposed Negative Declaration, please
contact Vijaya Jammalamadaka, Planning and Community Assistance Section, same
address, (805) 961-8893. Comments on the Initial Study/Proposed Negative
Declaration must be written, limited to environmental issues, and received by
5:00 p.m. on July 8, 1996.
Published Friday, June 14, 1996.
Return to FAQs- Definition of Reactive Organic
Compounds (ROC)
|